As we become ever more dependent on our
laptops, smartphones and various other means to surf the web, internet crime
continues to increase at an alarming rate. There’s no doubt that this rise in
cybercrime is linked to organized crime; criminal gangs worldwide exploit the
anonymity of the internet to conduct illegal activity. However, a recent story
by BBC News about “political hacktivists” demonstrates that criminals are
not the only ones using illegal hacking techniques to achieve their goals.
Hacktivism, in the broadest sense, refers to
the use of digital tools for a political or social cause. The tactics of
hacktivism include blocking access to websites, identity theft, virtual
sit-ins, and website redirects. Hacktivism is as controversial as traditional
activism; some believe that harmful cyberattacks represent a justifiable form
of protest while others think that all types of protest should remain peaceful.
In light of the abovementioned BBC News story, it seems that the former camp is
gaining followers as political hacktivists take action to make their point.
According to the article, cyber-activists used
hacking techniques to block access to Australian government websites in order
to protest the government’s decision to filter certain content. The cyber-activists
used Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, which attempt to make a site
or service unavailable to its users. According to the security firm Prolexic,
the cyber-activists used new methods to implement their plan. Traditionally,
DDoS attacks have been employed by cybercriminals. However, the political
hacktivists behind the Australian attacks utilized new techniques to shut down
the target sites – an outcome that raises an interesting issue. Should
hacktivists who use DDoS attacks, or other illegal methods, to make a political
point be punished as severely as cybercriminals who do so for other reasons,
such as financial gain?
Comments
Post a Comment