The Hawthorne effect is the modification of behavior by study participants in response to their knowledge that they are being observed or singled out for special treatment. In the simplest terms, the Hawthorne effect is increasing output in response to being watched.
The term Hawthorne
effect arose in connection with the Hawthorne studies, which were a ground-breaking
series of studies beginning in the 1920s that tested the impact of
working-condition variables on employee productivity. Most experts do
not believe there was a so-called Hawthorne effect in the Hawthorne studies,
but it persists as a widely used term.
Complicating the use of
the term the Hawthorne effect is its inconsistent meaning from use to
use; it is often used for a number of effects beyond the
aforementioned. As for the use of the term the Hawthorne effect in
psychological and health studies, many in the scientific community say it
should be replaced with more specific terminology pertinent to whatever is
being studied.
Hawthorne studies'
contribution to modern management
The 1920s were marked by
industrialism. Workers -- many of whom were immigrants or first-generation
Americans -- faced long, monotonous workdays and were considered to be
interchangeable parts of a big industrial "machine." It was an era
during which many educated and higher-class Americans considered these factory
workers to be intellectually and biologically inferior, ideas found in
dystopian works by authors such as Aldous Huxley and George Orwell.
In contrast, the
Hawthorne studies pioneered a sea change in the perception of what constituted
appropriate treatment of workers and what constituted a more ideal management
style. The result was a more humanistic view of workers, what is called often
termed the human relations school of management.
Indeed, lead researcher
Elton Mayo -- in contrast to the authoritarian view of ideal
management -- concluded that job satisfaction increased when workers had the
freedom to decide on output standards and their ideal worker conditions and
were able to collaborate. Mayo believed good management was not a matter of
solving problems simply with technical efficiency, but instead required skills
in human relations. These included what would now be called emotional
intelligence and soft skills, such as counselling, motivating and
communicating -- a far cry from scientific management's symbol of a man with a
clipboard timing worker.
Comments
Post a Comment