Network-attached storage (NAS) is
dedicated file storage that enables multiple users and heterogeneous client
devices to retrieve data from centralized disk capacity. Users on a local area
network (LAN) access the shared storage via a standard Ethernet connection.
NAS devices typically do not have a keyboard or display and are configured and
managed with a browser-based utility. Each NAS resides on the LAN as an
independent network node, defined by its own unique Internet Protocol (IP)
address.
What most characterizes NAS is ease of
access, high capacity and fairly low cost. NAS devices provide infrastructure
to consolidate storage in one place and to support tasks, such as archiving and
backup, and a cloud tier.
NAS and storage area networks (SANs)
are the two main types of networked storage. NAS handles unstructured data,
such as audio, video, websites, text files and Microsoft Office documents. SANs
are designed primarily for block storage inside databases, also known as structured
data.
What network-attached storage is used
for
NAS enables users to collaborate and
share data more effectively, particularly work teams that are remotely located
or in different time zones. A NAS connects to a wireless router, making it easy
for distributed work environments to access files and folders from any device
connected to the network. Organizations commonly deploy a NAS environment as
the foundation for a personal or private cloud.
There are NAS products designed for use in large enterprises, as well as
those for home offices or small businesses. Devices usually contain at least
two drive bays, although single-bay systems are available for noncritical data.
Enterprise NAS gear is designed with more high-end data features to aid storage
management and usually comes with at least four drive bays.
Prior to NAS, enterprises had to configure and manage hundreds or even
thousands of discrete file servers. To expand storage capacity, NAS
appliances are outfitted with more or larger disks -- known as scale-up
NAS -- or clustered together for scale-out storage.
In addition, most NAS vendors partner with cloud storage providers to give
customers the flexibility of redundant backup.
While collaboration is a virtue of NAS, it can also be problematic.
Network-attached storage relies on hard disk drives (HDDs) to serve data. Input/output
(I/O) contention can occur when too many users overwhelm the system with
requests at the same time. Newer NAS systems use faster flash storage,
either as a tier alongside HDDs or in all-flash configurations.
NAS vs. DAS
Direct-attached storage (DAS) refers to a dedicated server or storage
device that is not connected to a network. A computer's internal hard drive is
the simplest example of DAS. To access files on direct-attached storage, the
end user must have access to the physical storage.
DAS has better performance than NAS, especially for compute-intensive
software programs. In its barest form, direct-attached storage may involve
nothing more than purchasing the drives to be inserted in a server.
However, DAS requires the storage on each device to be separately managed,
adding a layer of complexity. Unlike with NAS, DAS does not lend itself to
shared storage by multiple users.
NAS vs. SAN
A SAN organizes storage resources on an independent, high-performance
network. Network-attached storage handles I/O requests for individual files,
whereas a SAN manages I/O requests for contiguous blocks of data.
While NAS traffic moves across Transmission Control Protocol/Internet
Protocol (TCP/IP), such as Ethernet, a SAN can route network traffic over the
FC protocol designed specifically for storage networks. SANs can also use the
Ethernet-based iSCSI protocol instead of FC.
While a NAS can be a single device, a SAN provides full block-level access
to a server's disk volumes. Put another way, a client OS will view a NAS as a
file system, while a SAN is presented to disk as the client OS.
SAN/NAS Convergence
Until recently, technological barriers have kept the file and block
storage worlds separate, each in its own management domain and each with its
own strengths and weaknesses. The prevailing view of storage managers was that
block storage is first class and file storage is economy class. Giving rise to
this notion was a prevalence of business-critical databases housed on SANs.
With the emergence of unified storage, vendors sought to improve
large-scale file storage with SAN/NAS convergence. This consolidates
block- and file-based data on one storage array. Convergence supports SAN block
I/O and NAS file I/O within the same set of switches.
The concept of hyper-convergence first appeared in 2014, pioneered by
market leaders Nutanix and SimpliVity Corp. (now part of HPE). Hyper-converged
infrastructure (HCI) bundles the computing, network, SDS and virtualization
resources on a single appliance. HCI systems pool tiers of different storage
media and present it to a hypervisor as a NAS mount point, even though the
underlying shared resource is block-based storage. However, a drawback of HCI
is that only the most basic file services are provided, meaning a data center may
still need to implement a separate network with attached file storage.
Converged infrastructure (CI) packages servers, networking, storage and
virtualization resources on sets of hardware prevalidated by the CI vendor.
Unlike HCI, which consolidates devices in one chassis, CI consists of separate
devices. This gives customers greater flexibility in building their storage
architecture. Organizations looking to simplify storage management may opt for
CI and HCI systems to replace a NAS or SAN environment.
Comments
Post a Comment